Thanks
to facebook, any and all of the social issues are these days more lively and
get the attention they deserve. The issue of a stricter law for crime against
women is one such burning issue these days. Severe protests were carried on all
around the nation and for understandable reasons. Women in India grow up
facing eve-teasing and harassment in other forms and accept it as a part and
parcel of life. Most of them have assumed the convenient path of - "ignorance" is
bliss - to tackle the issue. This is a real shame and needs to change.
Although,
among this whole web of arguments, allegations and revolts I fail to appreciate
something. What is the government got to gain by not having a stricter law ? We
have been constantly accusing the government of wrong-doings against those
protesting in the Delhi.
We accuse the police of mishandling the protesters. We have constantly accused
the ministers of not being sensitive towards the issue. But what is personal
gain a police-man could have by beating the protester. Is he getting Rs 1000 or
something per protestor he uses his stick on. All I understand is he has to be
pretty strong to stand against people whom he actually supports but is
duty-bound to contain them. I can understand why the ministers would like to
quell the protests against a stronger Lokpal. I can understand why they would
like subdue anything against FDI. But why this time ? Do the prospective rapists
have an arrangement with the government to give them leniency and in return
they vote Congress next time? I just
fail to understand why would government oppose this ? In-fact the government
should be happy that they now have a reason to counter the human right
activists, formulate a stricter law and take credit for it in the next poles. And
if this is the case, who really is to blame for the water canons and the tear
gas and the lathi charge going on in the center.
Can
anybody help ?
No comments:
Post a Comment